Peer-Review Guidelines Promoting Replicability and Transparency in Psychological Science

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Transparency in peer review.

Would the publication of anonymous referee reports and editorial decision letters of published papers benefit the scientific debate? Results from a trial seem to suggest this.

متن کامل

Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals

BACKGROUND Recent controversies highlighting substandard peer review in Open Access (OA) and traditional (subscription) journals have increased the need for authors, funders, publishers, and institutions to assure quality of peer-review in academic journals. I propose that transparency of the peer-review process may be seen as an indicator of the quality of peer-review, and develop and validate...

متن کامل

Experimenter gender and replicability in science

There is a replication crisis spreading through the annals of scientific inquiry. Although some work has been carried out to uncover the roots of this issue, much remains unanswered. With this in mind, this paper investigates how the gender of the experimenter may affect experimental findings. Clinical trials are regularly carried out without any report of the experimenter's gender and with dub...

متن کامل

Intelligence science: reverse peer review?

, 1945 (2004); 303 Science et al. Donald Kennedy, Intelligence Science: Reverse Peer Review? www.sciencemag.org (this information is current as of November 23, 2006 ): The following resources related to this article are available online at http://www.sciencemag.org version of this article at: including high-resolution figures, can be found in the online Updated information and services, http://...

متن کامل

What Should Researchers Expect When They Replicate Studies? A Statistical View of Replicability in Psychological Science.

A recent study of the replicability of key psychological findings is a major contribution toward understanding the human side of the scientific process. Despite the careful and nuanced analysis reported, the simple narrative disseminated by the mass, social, and scientific media was that in only 36% of the studies were the original results replicated. In the current study, however, we showed th...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

سال: 2018

ISSN: 2515-2459,2515-2467

DOI: 10.1177/2515245918806489